Human beings are an extremely curious species. We want to not only understand the world around us, but also gain a greater understanding of the universe – how it evolved and how it works. The reality, though, is that our world is ever-changing, evolving before our very eyes. Meet Destiny Ramjohn, an expert program evaluator and qualitative researcher. She has used her expertise to strengthen the greater medical community to better serve servicemen and women, women in foreign countries, and various organizations in the United States.
As part of her work, Destiny Ramjohn utilizes qualitative methods as one of the primary building blocks of her research framework. “Qualitative research methods are appropriately suited for specific types of research,” explains Destiny Ramjohn. “Unlike quantitative research, the results from qualitative research are rich in detail, explaining the hows and whys behind a circumstance. It’s absolutely crucial to maintain the distinction between measurable effects and the subjective effects of any study.”
Throughout her career, specifically as a program evaluator, Destiny Ramjohn has utilized document review, interviews, and focus groups to find the results she wants. Furthermore, grounded theory, comparison, taxonomy, hermeneutics, and many other qualitative analytic techniques have been used to help Destiny Ramjohn craft, suggest, and implement new program work processes.
“Many science theories can be successfully applied to public health practices,” urges Destiny Ramjohn. “When we collaborate to improve the efficiencies of any practice, we can ensure that more citizens have access to healthcare services and treatment.”
Destiny Ramjohn is a graduate of Columbia University.
As part of her work, Destiny Ramjohn utilizes qualitative methods as one of the primary building blocks of her research framework. “Qualitative research methods are appropriately suited for specific types of research,” explains Destiny Ramjohn. “Unlike quantitative research, the results from qualitative research are rich in detail, explaining the hows and whys behind a circumstance. It’s absolutely crucial to maintain the distinction between measurable effects and the subjective effects of any study.”
Throughout her career, specifically as a program evaluator, Destiny Ramjohn has utilized document review, interviews, and focus groups to find the results she wants. Furthermore, grounded theory, comparison, taxonomy, hermeneutics, and many other qualitative analytic techniques have been used to help Destiny Ramjohn craft, suggest, and implement new program work processes.
“Many science theories can be successfully applied to public health practices,” urges Destiny Ramjohn. “When we collaborate to improve the efficiencies of any practice, we can ensure that more citizens have access to healthcare services and treatment.”
Destiny Ramjohn is a graduate of Columbia University.
